Short List of Grant Writing Tips

 

Successful grant proposals require careful planning, attention to detail, and clear packaging.

Be thoroughly familiar with the grantor’s interests, intentions, and needs.  Clearly state how your proposal will help the grantor reach their audience/mission.  Make sure you meet the eligibility requirements.

Remember, each proposal is unique.  They must be specific to the project at hand and match the non-profit’s unique capabilities with the grantor’s mission.  One template does not fit all!

Speak the grantor’s language.  Use their literature as a “style guide” to reinforce the commonality between your project’s and the grantor’s goals.

Strong documented community support is an important ingredient of successful proposals.

Personal contact with the grantor is recommended.  Asking the grantor for feedback and guidance allows you to float “trial balloons” regarding your approach, strategy and goals.  In addition, it gives your proposal exposure among the grantor’s staff. When possible, a personal visit to the grantor's office may allow you to highlight portions of your proposal and to address or reinforce the grantor’s reaction.  Also, presenting a preliminary letter of intent that summarizes your proposal may increase your chances of success.

Know the grantor’s calendar.  Make sure you comply with all deadlines (or be prepared to wait until the next year’s funding cycle).

Most proposals follow a similar outline. Each piece builds upon the prior one and must excite the reader enough to continue reading through the entire proposal.  In general, they include:

  • Executive Summary – short and sweet (one page)!  This critical part of your package must capture the interest of the reader.  It is best prepared after the proposal is complete. 

  • Needs Analysis – must clearly address the problem with factual evidence of the need to undertake the project. Data must be accurate, current and unemotional.  The project must be worthwhile and your organization’s capabilities and skills should be stated in a way that makes it clear that your organization can help remedy the problem.  Decide whether or not the problem is replicable; if so, could your solution be a model for others?

  • Description of the project – this section should consist of five sub-sections: measurable objectives, detailed methods, qualified staffing/administration, formal product and process evaluation, and sustainability (long term viability).

  • Budget – a well-prepared expense budget must tie directly into the project description and justify all expenditures.  This will become a good management tool once the project is approved and funded. 

  • Information about your organization and conclusion – Details about your organization’s skills and experience should come only after the need for the project is established.  A good conclusion will summarize the benefits and may introduce future tasks.

Have a qualified third party proofread your material. Continuity, clarity, spelling, grammar and neatness all count!

Don’t over promise.  Keep your goals realistic.

The size of your proposal should reflect the size of your dollar request. Quality, not the quantity of the information presented is what matters.

If your project is rejected, a follow-up call can provide invaluable information.  Perhaps the grantor ran out of funds or misunderstood a point in the proposal.  Clarifying the reason for rejection will help with future grant applications.

When in doubt, apply anyway.  When your project is compelling, it may qualify for funding even if you do not meet 100% of the eligibility requirements.